IPTI Header
bar
     
Home
About
Directory
News
Perspectives
Resources
Contact Us
 

Read about existing implementations below:

 

 
About

 

In response to the threat of intentional and natural mass casualty incidents, numerous efforts are underway at the federal, state, and local levels to strengthen America’s emergency response infrastructure and ensure that the emergency response community is adequately prepared, resourced, and organized to overcome the unique FirstReschallenges of mass casualty patient care.

One such effort is the development and acquisition of “patient tracking systems” as a means to improve emergency response and preparedness capabilities by electronically capturing and distributing patient information to various stakeholders throughout the continuum of care, such as emergency managers and local hospitals.  While versions of these systems are in various stages of development, at all levels of government and from geographically diverse settings such as Kansas City and the National Capital Region, they have faced similar challenges. These challenges include:

  • Acceptance and use: identification of a system that is useful during both day-to-day and mass casualty emergency operations.
  • Interoperability: integration into the community’s existing portfolio of emergency application systems.
  • Federal compliance: assurance that efforts are compliant with grant requirements (Target Capabilities List) and federal programs such as Electronic Health Records.
  • Reinventing wheels: allocation of time and resources to defining requirements, RFPs, and the like.
  • Needs of all users: meeting the needs of all relevant agencies for such a system.
  • Economics: justification of an investment in a patient tracking initiative.

Phase I | Phase II | Phase III


Patient Tracking in Action

The diagram below illustrates some of the examples of data that could be shared between the various members of the broader emergency response community. The upper two quadrants focus on patient and victim care while the lower two focus on management of the incident. All four quadrants play a role whether the event is a traffic accident, a fire, a flood or a major hurricane.

Chart

Click here for a larger view of the chart.

Back to Top

 

Return to COMCARE

Contributors and Participants

Fire/EMS

  • American Ambulance Association (AAA)
  • Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS)
  • Chicago Heights Fire Department
  • Maryland Institute for EMS Systems (MIEMSS)
  • National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP)
  • National Association of State EMS Directors (NAEMSD)
  • National Association of EMTS
  • Orange County (Fla) Fire - Rescue

Emergency Medicine/
Hospitals

  • American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP)
  • Emergency Nurses Association (ENA)
  • Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association (VHHA)
  • University of North Carolina Hospitals Disaster Management

Academic

  • Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL)
  • University of Virginia (UVA)

Emergency Management

  • International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM)

Public Health and Medicine

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  • Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
  • Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
  • Montgomery County (MD) Department of Health
  • National Association of Health Data Organizations (NAHDO)
  • Public Health Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC)
  • San Francisco Department of Public Health—EMS and Emergency Operations Section

Disaster Services/9-1-1

  • National Emergency Number Association (NENA)
  • The American Red Cross

IPTI Home · IPTI Contacts · COMCARE Home · Privacy Policy · All rights reserved. COMCARE © 2006-2007